Featured Research
Macroeconomic Insights: The Red Sea Escalation, the Tariff Regime Reset and the U.S. Inflation Path
The new round of United States tariffs will not add materially to inflation. The 10% Section 122 surcharge lapses today, 24 July 2026, and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is finalising a Section 301 forced labour action to replace it at 10%...
Macroeconomic Insights: The Red Sea Escalation, the Tariff Regime Reset and the U.S. Inflation Path
The new round of United States tariffs will not add materially to inflation. The 10% Section 122 surcharge lapses today, 24 July 2026, and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is finalising a Section 301 forced labour action to replace it at 10% for fourteen economies and 12.5% for a further forty six. The rate rises two and a half points for the larger tier and falls to nothing for every trading partner outside the action, leaving the average effective rate close to its current 7.2%. We expect the tariff term to subtract from year on year core inflation over the next twelve months as the 2025 impulse rolls out of the base. The forecast risk now sits in crude, where Brent crossed $100 per barrel this week after Iran-aligned Houthi forces struck two Saudi tankers near Bab-el-Mandeb.
The Tariff Regime Reset
The Supreme Court struck down the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on 20 February 2026, forcing the administration onto Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 within days. The average effective tariff rate fell from 10.6% in January to 7.2% in May. Dispersion now matters more than the average, with steel and aluminium at 41.2%, Chinese goods at 23.4% and European Union origin goods at the 15% trade agreement ceiling since 1 July. The Section 232 duties carrying that dispersion were untouched by the litigation and have no sunset clause.
The successor is a labour standards measure. USTR found in June that most of the sixty countries in its Section 301 forced labour investigation had failed to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on imports made with forced labour, setting 12.5% for those failing on both counts and 10% for the rest. Section 301 carries no statutory rate ceiling and no time limit, which is what Section 122 lacked.
The realised path settles the attribution. Headline CPI troughed at 2.4% YoY in January and February 2026, when the tariff burden was at its highest, and climbed to 4.2% in May after the effective rate had been cut by more than three percentage points (Figure 1). Energy inflation moved from 0.5% YoY in February to 23.5% in May. Core moved from 2.5% to 2.9% and has since returned to 2.6%.
Figure 1. US headline and core CPI, % YoY (upper), and the energy index, % YoY (lower), with the February 2026 tariff regime change marked. October 2025 was not published owing to the lapse in appropriations. Source: BLS.

The June release confirmed the direction, with headline down 0.4% MoM to 3.5% YoY on a 5.7% fall in energy, core unchanged at 2.6% and core goods at 0.8% YoY, the slowest since June 2025. That relief has already reversed. Crude gave up its war premium during the 60-day ceasefire and traded below $72 in early July, and Brent has rallied more than 30% since as strikes on Iran continued.
Model Performance Through the Tariff Cycle
Our nowcasts tracked realised outturns closely through the September 2025 to February 2026 releases, when the 2025 tariff waves were passing through to shelf prices (Figure 2). Errors sat inside roughly a tenth of a percentage point in most of those windows. The December 2025 release is the clearest case, where our nowcast moved down towards the realised 2.7% while consensus held nearer 2.85%.
To read the rest of this article, take a look at our latest Substack post, here.
Research Archive
Macroeconomic Insights: India’s Inflation Paradox – Headline Drops, Core Rises
In recent forecasts, Turnleaf has observed an interesting trend in India’s inflation dynamics. While headline inflation has been trending downward, largely driven by a decrease...
Macroeconomic Insights: Polish Inflation – What Could Be, What Won’t Be in 2025
Recent retail sales in Poland have come in below expectations (-0.5%YoY in February 2025), with a significant decline driven by vehicle sales, followed by reduced consumption in...
Macroeconomic Insights: Mexico’s Inflation Path In Tariff Uncertainty Limbo
The tail of our inflation curve is currently driven by two key factors: U.S. tariffs set for April 2, 2025, and Plan Mexico, which aims to revitalize domestic manufacturing and...
Macroeconomic Insights: How Germany’s Fiscal Stimulus Could Reshape Its Inflation Outlook
Amid shifting geopolitical tensions and the need to revitalise its economy, Germany is preparing for a massive fiscal stimulus that will allocate up to $1 trillion in defence and...
Emerging Markets: Turnleaf Discusses Impact on Hungary’s 10% Profit Margin Cap Restriction on Inflation
Policy: In Hungary, from March 17 to May 31, 2025, a 10% profit margin cap will be imposed on 30 essential products, limiting companies' profits on these items. Small independent...
Macroeconomic Insights: U.S. Inflation is Coming, But Not Where You Expect
Since taking office, President Trump has aggressively worked to revitalize domestic manufacturing by focusing on the U.S. trade balance. A key part of this strategy has been...
Learning from running financial models live
Let's say you are the world's best burger chef (we all have ambitions, right). You'd be serving up all manner of burgers for your customers. It would be odd though, wouldn't it,...
Macroeconomics Insights – Beyond Tariffs: How Uncertainty is Steering U.S. Inflation Expectations
When we forecast inflation, our goal is to account for as much explainable variation as possible, using available data and reasonable assumptions about how prices evolve....
Macroeconomic Insights: Tariffs, Manufacturing, and Mexico Inflation
This article marks the start of Turnleaf’s series on how U.S. tariffs shape inflation dynamics across Latin America (LATAM). Among the economies we monitor—Colombia, Brazil,...
Macroeconomic Insights: How U.S. Tariffs and Eurozone Weakness Are Shaping Chinese Inflation
The trajectory of Chinese inflation will largely depend on its sensitivity to U.S. tariffs and its ability to sustain domestic GDP growth through external demand, particularly...
Macroeconomic Insights: Prices to Increase in February 2025 as Canada’s Tax Holiday Takes a Holiday
Between mid-December 2024 and mid-February 2025, the Canadian government implemented a GST/HST tax holiday, exempting beverages, restaurants, children’s clothing and footwear,...
Macroeconomic Insights: Fueling the Inflation Fire – Turnleaf’s Turkish Inflation Curve Shifts Upwards
Turnleaf’s latest data has pushed Turkey’s inflation outlook higher than consensus forecasts. There are multiple reasons for this which we will explain in this note. One of the...
Macroeconomic Insights: Assessing the Inflationary Impact of U.S. Steel & Aluminum Tariffs
The newly announced 25% tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum imports introduces cost pressures across global supply chains. However, the key question is not just how markets react,...
Emerging Markets: January 2025 Colombia and Hungary CPI YoY Forecast Review
2025 Colombia CPI YoY Above Consensus Due to Global Inflation Pressures Turnleaf’s CPI YoY model projects Colombia inflation well above consensus 12 months out, as it more...
Emerging Markets: January 2025 India CPI YoY Forecast Review
In our January 2025 YoY CPI forecast, we projected inflation at 4.57%, slightly above the realized 4.3%, yet outperforming consensus (4.71%)—even with our estimate released a...